| Robert C. Byrd U.S. Courthouse Charleston, West Virginia |
|
![]()
| U.S. Courthouse and Federal
Building Central Islip, New York |
|
| O N T H E B O A R D S | ||||
| Credits Richard Meier Michael
Spector Northeast
and Caribbean Region |
Clarity of internal organization and direct circulation were guiding principles for this crisp, white, rectilinear Federal courthouse overlooking the Atlantic Ocean on Long Island. A striking conical drum encloses the entry and leads to a soaring 11-story atrium that provides light and a central reference point for public circulation on each floor. Public corridors are on the south façade, with magnificent ocean views. This gives transparency and a sense of openness consistent with the ideals of a democratic society to this large, 925,000-square-foot courthouse. Staff circulation zones and judges' chambers are on the north side. The conical drum is a contemporary expression of the Beaux-Arts entry hall and the early American bell towera landmark element at once recognizable as the entry. It is designed to serve as an appropriately scaled arrival point for large crowds entering the building. On the north façade, the ceremonial courtroom extends from the building and is expressed as a chamfered box, in counterpoint to the conical entry drum. A courtroom module is stacked four high and wide along a massive three-foot-thick limestone wall. One side opens to the courtrooms. On the other side are public lobbies with ocean views through louvered glass. Another limestone wall perpendicularly bisects the first, separating district and magistrate courts from the bankruptcy courts. |
The jury admired
the elemental quality of the composition wherein the
functional components are clearly expressed and
organized. Building materials interface simply and
elegantly to amplify the reading of the volumes within
the overall building mass. The layering of the exterior
wall system is driven by the goal to articulate scale and
admit controlled light into the public corridors and is
masterfully achieved. - Jury Comment |
||
![]()
| U.S. Post Office and Courthouse Brooklyn, New York |
|
![]()
| William J. Nealon Federal
Building and U.S. Courthouse Scranton, Pennsylvania |
|
![]()
| Edward Gignoux U.S.
Courthouse Portland, Maine |
|
![]()
| Restoration Alexander Calder's Flamingo Chicago, Illinois |
|
| H
I S T O R I C P R E S E R V A T I O N / C O N S E R V A T I O N |
||||
| Credits Robert G. Lodge Great
Lakes Region |
Flamingo by Alexander Calder was installed at the Chicago Federal Center in 1974. Its graceful curves and brilliant orange complement and contrast with the black and blocky enormity of the Mies van der Rohe buildings closing in and towering around it. Restoring this internationally renowned sculpture and symbol of GSAs commitment to quality public art required the application of industrial techniques to art conservation. New industrial coating materials and the methodologies of the modern steel-coating industry provided a solution to a problem that was addressed three times in the past by simple, but ineffective, repainting. Complete removal of all of the coating was necessary because of accumulated thickness. Both accurate color and a very specific surface quality were required. Color mixing, ambient temperatures and humidity, and timing of applications were critical. The resultachieved in consultation with the Calder Foundationis a finish that matches the original in color and surface quality while adding superior color-retention properties and protection against moisture penetration. |
The use of
state-of-the-art methods and expertise have set standards
for others to consult when faced with outdoor sculpture
preservation projects across the country. This project
should serve to stimulate others to begin similar
preservation efforts on endangered works. - Jury Comment |
||
![]()
| Engineering and
Environmental Study U.S. Courthouse and Federal Building Phoenix, Arizona Phoenix, Arizona |
|
![]()
| Jacob Javits Plaza New York, New York |
|
![]()
| Urban Design Guidelines for Physical Perimeter and Entrance Security: An Overlay to the Master Plan for the Federal Triangle Washington, District of Columbia |
|
| U R B A N P L A N N I N G | ||||
| Because security
and personal safety have become central concerns for
Federal agencies and designers of Federal facilities,
this study and its recommendations are most important.
The design guidelines address critical economic, social,
and aesthetic issues that the existing urban buildings
and streetscapes pose. These are broadly considered and
well presented. They will help educate the various
managerial personnel, technical experts, and public
constituencies involved in the review and approval of
security remedies, both in the Federal Triangle and
beyond. - Jury Comment |
In the aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing, security has become a pressing issue for Federal agencies. Concern has been particularly high in the Federal Triangle, the historic 70-acre complex in downtown Washington that houses more than 25,000 Federal employees and is the headquarters for several high-profile agencies, including the Department of Justice and the Internal Revenue Service. The area--a critical element in the capitals urban fabric as a gateway to the Mall for tourists and southern boundary of the citys increasingly lively downtown--could potentially become a minefield of intrusive and unsightly barriers. The U.S. General Services Administration was challenged to find a way to provide cost-effective security while maintainingeven enhancingthe vitality and character of the area and minimizing limitations on public access. As a first step toward a solution, GSA organized a design charrette to develop guidelines for physical perimeter and entrance security that will help Federal agencies and design review bodies, such as the Commission on Fine Arts and the National Capital Planning Commission, deal with security issues in the Federal Triangle in a consistent, comprehensive manner. These guidelines will help ensure that this historic area of architectural treasures will be safe, yet remain as open as possible to the public. |
Credits Suman Sorg National
Capital Region |
||
![]()
| Governors Island Land
Use Study New York Harbor New York, New York |
|
| U R B A N P L A N N I N G | ||||
| Credits John H. Beyer Northeast
and Caribbean Region |
For more than
two centuries, Governors Island in New York Harbor was
used exclusively as a military post. In the summer of
1997, the post was closed, and Congress directed the U.S.
General Services Administration to sell the island.
Located one-half mile from Lower Manhattan, it contains
225 structures on 172 acres of land, including more than
100 acres of open space. Approximately 92 acres have been
designated as a National Historic District, featuring 18th
century fortifications, pre-Civil War arsenal buildings,
Victorian housing, and early 20th century
neoclassical architecture. Recognizing the special qualities of the island, GSA commissioned a land use study. The study explores solutions for creating an economically viable reuse scenario that will balance historic preservation concerns with sensitive and thoughtful new design, encourage public access, and integrate the island into larger scale local and regional planning efforts. It was designed to both inform the public and guide development of an Environmental Impact Statement. The study presents six options: reuse, academic, recreation, mixed-use, maximum development, and phase-in. A financial analysis was performed for each of the options. Thirteen Federal, State and city agencies; more than 30 national and local educational, civic, and planning organizations; and over 300 individuals provided input. |
This
studywith its alternative development options and
extensive public participatory processis an
effective model for how the Federal Government should
embark on disposing of the properties it no longer needs.
Its six alternative land use options are based on
relevant urban, environmental, economic, social, and
historic factors. The study has served local and Federal
interests in improving the prospects for significant and
appropriate development in the future. - Jury Comment |
||
![]()
| Federal
Triangle Flowers Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center Washington, DC |
|
| A R T | ||||
| The artist
masterfully utilized the siting cues of the Oscar Straus
Memorial Fountain at the 14th Street entrance
in the placement of these sculptures. Together, the
sculptures work in complementary unison with the
completed Federal Triangle. By creating these two very
elegant and successful works, the artist, in essence, has
paid a distinct tribute to the Federal Triangle period of
art-in-architecture. - Jury Comment |
As an allusion to the architectural ornamentation so evident in the historic buildings of the Federal Triangle in Washington, DC, but absent from the new Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center, artist Stephen Robin chose flowersalbeit 14-foot cast aluminum flowersto link the neoclassical Ariel Rios Building to the new building across a four-acre public courtyard. Flowers are traditional landscape architectural devices for defining boundaries and creating awareness of transitions. The forms of the two flowersa lily and a rosecombine Beaux Arts and Art Deco influences, a reference to the transition from one style to the other in the architectural ornamentation of the Federal Triangle. While the flowers share characteristics of both styles, the emphasis in the lily is on the horizontal and flowing and in the rose, on the diagonal and staccato. |
Credits Stephen Robin National
Capital Region |
||
![]()
| Boundary Markers National Building Museum Washington, DC |
|
![]()
| Justice Warren B. Rudman U.S. Courthouse Concord, New Hampshire |
|
| A R T | ||||
| The artists
undeniable clarity in presenting the subject, Justitia,
is remarkable in its serenity and its relationship to the
architectural space. The glistening stainless steel of
the work is a unique and somewhat unexpected choice of
medium for the noble subject. The positioning of the
figure conveys humanity and strength as complementary
virtues of necessity. - Jury Comment |
Aloof, yet
ever present, Justice in the form of a
nine-and-a-half-foot stainless steel sculpture standing
squarely on an eight-foot granite base dominates the
soaring 36-foot-high lobby of the new Warren B. Rudman
U.S. Courthouse in Concord, New Hampshire. As the focal
point of the lobby, the figure restates in sculptural
form the vertical thrust of the space. Shedding her traditional scale and sword, Justice is raising her arms to tighten the knot in her blindfold to ensure objectivity and greater clarity of judgment. The confrontational directness of the stance and the simplicity of the form have a contemporary feel, yet evoke the ancient art of Egypt and Asia. Stainless steel--the same material used for the stair railing and lobby fixtures--gives the figure a shimmering, ethereal quality, yet is universally recognized as being very durable and is thus an appropriate medium for this symbol of the American judicial system. |
Credits Diana K. Moore New
England Region |
||
![]()
| Africa Rising 290 Broadway New York, New York |
|
![]()
| Untitled (Architectural Glass) Robert C. Byrd U.S. Courthouse Charleston, West Virginia |
|
![]()
| Lens Ceiling U.S. Courthouse and Federal Building Phoenix, Arizona |
|
| A R T | ||||
| Credits James Carpenter Pacific
Rim Region |
In a
synthesis of art, architecture, and engineering, the
ceiling of the Special Proceedings Courtroom in the new
U.S. Courthouse and Federal Building in Phoenix will be a
delicate web of translucent glass. When lighted, the
glowing, cable-suspended structure may be read as a
representation of the sun or as a bubble of air resting
on a calm water surface. The courtroom is three-story-high, translucent glass drum 100 feet in diameter in the mammoth six-story, 58,000-square-foot rectangular glass atrium of the courthouse. This glass drum is visible from the street and is intended to indicate to the public the importance of the cases heard there. The lens ceiling forms an acoustic seal between the courtroom and the atrium. In addition to serving as a source of light and a work of art, it aesthetically conceals a fire-sprinkler system. |
This intriguing
work is designed so that artwork, architecture, and
structure are synthesized as one statement, melding the
physical and natural worlds through the use of light.
This dramatic effort will yield an extraordinary, unique
courtroom, sculptural by its very nature, and guided to
that end via the shared visions of the artist and the
architect. - Jury Comments |
||
![]()
| Renewing the Commitment 30th Anniversary of the Architectural Barriers Act |
|
| G R A P H I C D E S I G N | ||||
| The success of this
piece begins with a powerful series of abstracted art
works that focus on the issue of accessibility. The vivid
colors, choice of papers, and technique that portrays
texture within simple fields are successful. - Jury Comment |
As manager of the National Program for Accessibility, GSAs Public Buildings Service used the 30th anniversary of the passage of the Architectural Barriers Act to create a marketing package to promote and educate the Government community and general public about integrating accessibility into the workplace. A colorful package was developed around four simple illustrations depicting design elements that influence accessibility, such as entrances and work surfaces. The eye-catching illustrations, by a paraplegic artist, symbolize accomplishments in advancing the civil rights of people with disabilities. The commemorative package consists of a brochure, stationery, workshop invitation, poster, and paperweight. |
Credits Jean Tullier Office
of External Affairs |
||
![]()